Search form

November 24, 2015
A Valid Will Requires Two Witness Signatures
Attorneys: 

Court of Appeals holds that two non-identical documents, each signed by a different witness, cannot be combined into a valid will under Washington law.

Washington law requires that a valid last will and testament be witnessed by two witnesses. Most of the time, that is never in doubt.  However, sometimes things don’t always go to plan.  In Estate of Burton v. Didricksen, Division Two of the Washington Court of Appeals recently held, as a matter of first impression, that a two separate non-identical documents, each signed by a different witness, cannot be combined into a valid will under Washington law.

Shortly before Ray Burton passed away, he wrote and signed a document, witnessed by a home health care nurse, purportedly leaving his entire estate to Victor White.  The day before he died, Burton then wrote a second document, witnessed by a different hospice nurse, that also purported to leave his estate to White.  After Burton’s passing, White petitioned to admit the two separate documents to probate as Burton’s will, while Burton’s relatives moved for an order declaring that Burton died intestate (without a will).  The trial court found that Burton died without a will, and White appealed.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court, noting that Washington law requires two witnesses to a single document.  Since White could not show that the nurses had signed the same document, or even identical copies of the same document, Burton had died without a will.  The Court noted that “the risk of mistake—if not fraud—would be high if [it] allowed probate of a testamentary document signed by only one witness when the second “witness” never saw that document.”

The Burton case shows that Washington trust and estate law can be complex.  If you have a question about wills, trusts, probate or estate planning, please contact one of Eisenhower Carlson’s trust and estate attorneys.

Disclaimer

This advisory is a publication of Eisenhower Carlson PLLC. Our purpose in publishing this advisory is to inform our clients and friends of recent legal developments. It is not intended, nor should it be used, as a substitute for specific legal advice as legal counsel may only be given in response to inquiries regarding particular situations.

Eisenhower Carlson PLLC © 2011  ||  Credits & Disclaimers

DISCLAIMER:
This website is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice.

No portion of this page or any content herein may be redistributed or republished without written permission from Eisenhower Carlson PLLC.The information you'll find here is our way of introducing you to Eisenhower Carlson PLLC. It contains no official legal opinions. No responsibility is assumed for the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this website. The information on this website is not intended as a substitute for legal counsel, and is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.

We invite you to contact us by phone, fax or e-mail for a session with one of our lawyers.

For your own protection, we strongly suggest that you do not transmit confidential documents to us or anyone else via unsecured email.

If you have any questions or comments concerning this site, please send an email to admin@eisenhowerlaw.com. Do not send confidential information via email.

CREDITS:
Concept & Design: CAVLRY
Photography: CAVLRY
Drupal CMS Development: Praece Strategic Technolog Consulting